Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Blog 28: Research Paper: Modern Romance and Classical Romance Final Project


Generra Johnson
19 December 2012
ENG 3029-01
Professor Chandler
Research Paper: Modern Romance and
Classical Romance
Introduction:
            There is classical romance and modern day romance. Actually there are different types of romance genres. Today’s romances are different from the romance of thirty years ago because of the different features found in the romance novels. For example in the book, Reading the Romance, by Janice Radway the romances of 1984, would be different but yet the same romances read by today’s readers of 2012. So today’s readers still do look for the features of 1984, but they want more of a modern-day twist to the story. In other words they want something new. Some of the features that they want in a classical romance are: They want to hear about the story. Another feature that women want in a classical romance is to have the feeling of that time era. Now the features of modern day romance that women want to read about are the drama between characters and the story plot. The features of classical romance novels have changed since thirty years ago, but the features have also stayed the same. The features of modern day romance are also the same as the features of classical romance, but there are still different features in them. The purpose of my study is to find out what elements of romance do women like in a romance.
What I will and expect to show in this study is that women still like the features of the past romances, and they also like modern features in today’s romances. My work is important because it will see what features women like to read about today. It will give a writer, who writes romance novels an in depth idea on what women want to read in a romance novel. It will also paint a picture for the writer as to what themes women would want to read in a romance novel. It will also show what women liked to read about thirty years ago, which relates to the features of the romance novel. The answer that I found in my research is that women still love the features of the past like romance, or even boy meets girl. The women love the characters and their chemistry. They love to hear about the how the characters meet. They even love how the characters have problems, and how the problems bring them even closer. As for the women of today, they love drama and romance. It is all drama, drama, drama. They love the thrill and the suspense in the story. I interviewed two women, one is a young adult and the other is an adult.
Literature Review:
            The other authors that have findings that are related to my work are Janice Radway. She wrote the book, Reading the Romance, and this work that she wrote does relate to my work. Her findings pointed out why women read romance novels. One reason she found that women read romance novels is because they wanted to get away from their daily lives, and make their own world of comfort and enjoyment. As illustrated in Radway’s conclusion, “In picking up a book, as they have so eloquently told us, they refuse temporarily their family’s otherwise constant demand that they attend to the wants of others even as they act deliberately to do something for their own private pleasure. Their activity is compensatory, solitary space within an arena where their self-interest is usually identified with the interest of others and where they are defined as a public resource to be mined at will by the family” (Radway 211). The second reason women read romance novels Radway discovered is: because they want to feel satisfied. Plus they want to feel the emotions that their everyday life does not have. “Romance reading supplements the avenues traditionally open to women for emotional gratification by supplying them vicariously with the attention and nurturance they do not get enough of in the round of day-to-day existence” (Radway 212). Lastly, the reason that women read romance novels is because they want to feel fulfilled and complete. However, her findings main objective is not to find out the features of romance novels like my purpose. But within her findings she found out what type of romance novels women like.
            What I am going to do differently from Radway is first I want to find out what plots women like in a romance novel. Another thing I am going to do differently from Radway is find out the features that women like in a romance novel. Radway also found those out in her surveys, but that was not the point of her book. Her point was why women read romances.
            Radway’s work relates to my work because during her surveys she found out what features a woman likes in a romance novel. That is my purpose to find out what features a woman likes in a romance novel. For example Radway asked in one of her surveys, “What are the three most important ingredients in a romance? Please pick the three which you think are essential and rank them by placing a number 1 next to the most important ingredient, a number 2 next to the second most important, and so on” (Radway 235). In this question, Radway’s findings point out what features women like in a romance novel. The findings that she found in this question are, “A happy ending,… A slowly but consistently developing love between hero and heroine,… [and]…Some detail about heroine and hero after they’ve gotten together” (67). These three findings in Radway’s survey had the highest points. Thirty-two people selected a happy ending, twenty-three people selected a slowly but consistently developing love between the hero and heroine, and last only twenty-two people selected some detail about the heroine and hero after they got together. This is how Radway’s work and findings relates to my work; she made questions to find the features of a romance novel in her research.
Methods:
            What I did with the two interviews was very different. Basically, during the first interview I did it face-to-face with my subject. The subject and I met at my house. I questioned my subject by using my computer. I had the questions right in front of me on my computer, and I used it to question the subject. The second subject, I was questioning over the telephone. I still had the questions in front of me on my computer, and I questioned the second subject. So in a way I did two different types of interviews: a face-to-face interview and a telephone interview.
            I chose my methods because they were the easiest to accomplish. It was easy for my first subject to come to my house because she lives near my house. As for the second subject, I was sick, and it was also hard for the second subject to come to meet me face-to-face. So we had an interview over the telephone.
            How I prepared to collect my data is by using a recorder to record my interviews with the two subjects. I also collected my data by typing it on the computer after I listened to it on the recorder. The reason I prepared my data this way is because recording was the best way to keep the information. I could keep the information on tape and listen to it many times. Also I can make adjustments to my transcript at any time.
            How I collected my data is: I recorded the interviews on the recorder. I recorded the interviews for thirty minutes each. I asked the questions each in a row and in order. But I did miss one question. It was the question on: How old were you when you started reading romance novels? Other than that, all the questions were answered, with great length and great honesty. Everything was collected smoothly, but the analysis had to be done a few times.
            How I analyzed the data is I saw which questions matched the others, and which data went together. How I decided which data went together was I identified the data that matched a certain theme. Those themes were that women want the story to relate to them, they also like the drama in the stories, and they want to know about the main characters that relate to them as well.
Presentation of Data:
            My overall focus in my research is to find the features that woman like in a romance novel. The meaning of my classification system is on romance, and the features of the romance novels. My classification is in a few groups. Those groups were the same as the themes that women like in a romance story. The themes are: women want the story to relate to them, they also like the drama in the stories, they also want to dream about the romance novels they read, they want to know about the main characters that relate to them as well, and they want the stories to draw them into the novel. In other words, they want the story line to be interesting as well.
            My categories occurred in different questions of my interview with my two subjects. The first category occurred in this question:
To you, what features make a good romance story?
·         Subject: I think the main component for any good story is the characters. There has to be something about them that makes you want to know who they are.
·         Interviewer: Okay.
·         Subject: And the relationship between them doesn’t always have to be: they meet they fall in love, and then the love story is the best love story that you ever read.
·         Interviewer: Yeah.
·         Subject: But their love story has to compel you, you know. It has to be a good chemistry to write, and it also has to be the right scene, the right timing, the right plot. Casey Cat for example writes two series one young adult called The House of Night with her daughter Kristen Cat, and then one for herself called The Goddess Series which she modernizes the romances. What I love about it is that she brings the characters to life. She puts them in a new situation where you want to know what happens. I have seen her books, and I have stayed up until two or three in the morning reading these books. It’s just like with any TV show, you have to know what happens.
·         Interviewer: Know what happens. Yeah, and it’s the same thing with this thing that I am looking at. This show that I am looking at called Elementary I am still wondering about their relationship.
·         Subject: Yeah, exactly. You got it perfectly.  Yeah, because the best relationship of the majority of love is when one of them is oblivious.
·         Interviewer: I know right.
·         Subject: I think that is always the best one. Then you have one of them in love, well technically you have both of them in love, but one of them is too dumb to see it.
·         Interviewer: Yeah, but for teens they usually say they are trying to find their way, their like, they are just going through a battle with puberty.
·         Subject: Yes, but when you have a true romantic it has the candle light dinners, and the candelabras, and they are all in just the right setting.
This question discusses the features of what makes a good romance novel. The first subject says that the characters, along with the chemistry in their relationship are what make a good romance novel. Basically, for the chemistry, the readers like different types of chemistry relationships. Examples of this type of relationship are: One character is positive while the other one is negative, another type is a peaceful character with a vengeful character, and another type of chemistry relationship is a smart/isolated character with a perky/popular character.
Then the next thing that makes a good romance novel is the progress in the character’s relationship. The readers also like different types of developing relationships. In romance novels there are many different types of developing relationships. One of my subjects loves the type of relationship where the guy/girl loves this one male/female, and the other party does not know it. That is one type of developing relationship. Another type of developing relationship is one that I am attracted to very much. It is called the love-hate relationship. Even though they might or might not get together the reader still wants to see the progress in the character’s relationship. Basically, many readers now like these different developing relationships.
Now as for the boy meets girl type of scenarios again there are many different types. One type is an accidental meeting, where the guy and girl were not supposed to meet but they did. Another type is a set-up meeting which happens often in life, where the guy and the girl were purposely arranged to meet each other. The last type is the destined meeting, where the guy and the girl were fated to meet each other; basically it is a prophesized meeting. As stated before there are many different types of features that make a good romance novel and the next question will continue to discuss the features of romance novels:
Subject One: What do you like about modern day romances?
·         Subject: I think I like the drama qualities of it. You know you never know who is going to get screwed, who is going to get together with who, who is digressing, who going behind who’s back. You know it is always a constant puzzle of: “If she finds out about this she is going to beat the both of them to death.”, or “I can’t believe he did that to him.”, or “Oh, my god she is pregnant with his baby.”, or “Oh my gosh.”
·         Interviewer: True.
·         Subject: That is what you like about it. That…
·         Interviewer: That drama in it mostly.
·         Subject: Also that I guess it relates to today’s reality.
·         Interviewer: Yup, and that is true, and as you told me reality is a good motivator.
·         Subject: Reality is a good motivator. You know as long as it’s interesting and true, I guess you can see yourself in the situation (the character’s situation). Not that I didn’t like Twilight that you like so much. A lot of girls like to be looked as Bella. Who is getting her Edward? You can see yourself in that type of position.
In this question it is discussed by the subject what is the best feature of modern day romances, which is the drama. Plus another feature is that everything is related to reality, and the women who read the modern day romances can relate to the story and the main character. The modern day romances also are set for a future time. They also deal with the issues of the current time setting as well. For example, this year is the year 2012, so the topic of most of the issues would be around year 2012. Next is the question which discusses the features of classical romances:
What do you like about classical romances?
·         Subject: And what I like in a classical romance is: I guess the classical style. You know the characters, and their biography, the background and the colors, and the imagery. You don’t see that a lot in today’s romances. In today’s romances it’s about the drama. They are usually about: who stabbed who in the back. You don’t hear much about the background in the story, which I think is the most important part of any good story.
·         Interviewer: Wow, because that is just classical romances are mostly like about the time setting, and the girl….
·         Subject: I know that plays a part in it, but look at today’s romances. Let’s compare Twilight to Pride and Prejudice. Twilight, you really don’t get the feel of what Edward looks like, you know you really can’t tell me right now he looks like. She only gives you an idea.
·         Interviewer: Or Bella, she just looks like an average girl with brown hair and brown eyes.
·         Subject: Wow that was descriptive. In Pride and Prejudice you see this tall imposing figure who has this gruff voice and he is stout and the way he speaks, you can see that he is a very dignified lord very stiff and introvert and into himself. And you can sort of see the characters, and you can see the characters grow, and the passion and love in him grow. I mean the Victorian age is much romanticized. I mean it was the birthplace of classical romance that we know today. And it is the Victoria era you know, the guy is what every girl wants but no longer exists. You know he not the knight in shining armor, so last year, he’s not what everyone wants anymore. He is an English gent (gentleman), which is very much what classical romance is, but the reason why you want him more is because he is more classical (basically a true gentleman) than this modernize emo (emotional) gothic prince.
In this question that is discussed with the second subject, is on classical romance. Plus there are a few points in this discussion. The first point is what does a woman dream about when reading a classical romance? She dreams about the guy that she wants. She also reads this classical romance to get away from the reality that she is faced with. Second, another feature that makes these classical romance novels is the characters and their backgrounds. To relate to the characters the reader must know about them. The classical romances are also set in a past time setting, like for example a classical romance novel would be set in the Victorian era. The last point in this discussion is that the classical romance novel just takes you to a place that only exists in fantasies. Then there is the next discussion on women wanting to dream during romance novels.
Subject Two: What do you like about modern day romances?
·         Subject: I like it as an escape. Because now that I am older and now that I have my own family and my own romances, it is a great thing that is a great escape from the real world.
In this discussion, it is said on how romance novels help women to escape from reality, or it basically helps them to dream about a life that they want. It also helps them to dream overall. These are the features in this discussion. Also all of the questions that were mentioned are on the features of romance novels.
Analysis of Data:
            The pattern of data did have one pattern that I noticed in both interviews. The common pattern is: women not only today, but also thirty years ago want something that they have in common with in the romance novel. It is something that they could say, “Oh that happened to me once.” Then another pattern that came about conclusively was that women want something that they can dream about. It would be something that they could think of and always hold on to.
            These patterns just came up randomly in the interviews, and when I was analyzing the data. What the data means is that women want to have something in common with the romance novel that they read. Plus women like to dream when they read romance novels. How the data works is it reviews the information that I was given in the interviews, and it tells a story of what women want in a romance novel. So the data would be presented as an oral interview and descriptive data. Also the readers have changed with the novels because it is a new time and a new era. So in response to the times changing the people have changed, and so has the romance novels that the authors create.
Conclusion:
            My research question is what the features that women like in a romance are. What I found was that women love drama, and they love something they can relate to in a romance. The romance story could be anything as long as it draws them into it. Plus as long as the women have something in common with the romance novel, they will read it. I also found out that woman to do not just like the genres in a romance novel, they also like again how the story relates to them. In addition they do not want the story to be boring.
            My study is important because it confirms what all women like in a romance. The women tell which genres they like, but they all want the story to relate to them. Plus they want the story to be interesting. Plus it will also show authors that are writing a romance novels these features that women want to read about. So they in turn can write the features in their romance novel. So my study confirms these theories by questioning women of different ages.
            In my opinion, there is more left to do. The thing that is left to do is to figure out how to write the romance novel, once the information about what features women want in a romance are collected. Also how can the novel come together, and how can it meet a woman’s expectations?


Works Cited
Radway, Janice A. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. North      Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press. Edited: P. Steiner, M. Cervenka, and   R. Voon. 1984.

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Blog 27: Comments on Class' Research Papers

Generra Johnson

18 December 2012

ENG 3029-01

Professor Chandler

Blog 27: Comments on Class' Research Papers
 
 
Sarah: Name what is important in your research paper. Also describe your methods, and how you collected the songs from your subject.
 
 
 
Liana: Have a more concrete research question.
 
 
 
Andrea: Describe the technologies that he has, and what was in his writing culture over time. Also explain about your subject's writing.
 
 

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Blog 26: Research Paper: Modern Romance and Classical Romance Second Draft


Generra Johnson
12 December 2012
ENG 3029-01
Professor Chandler
Research Paper: Modern Romance and
Classical Romance
Introduction:
            There is classical romance and modern day romance. Actually there are different types of romance genres. Today’s romances are different from the romance of thirty years ago. For example in the book, Reading the Romance, by Janice Radway the romances of 1984, would be different but yet the same romances read by today’s readers of 2012. So today’s readers still do read for the features of 1984, but they want more of a modern-day twist to the story. In other words they want something new. Many features of romances are the same, but some new features have been added. The identities of men and women have changed since thirty years ago, but the identities have also stayed the same. The purpose of my study is to find out what elements of romance do women like in a romance.
What I will and expect to show in this study is that women still like the features of the past romances, and they also like modern features in today’s romances. My work is important because it will see what features women like to read about today. It will also show what women liked to read about thirty years ago. The answer that I found in my research is that women still love the features of the past like romance, or even boy meets girl. They even love how they have problems, and the problems bring them even closer. As for the women of today, they love drama and romance. It is all drama, drama, drama. They love the thrill and the suspense in the story. I interviewed two women, one is a young adult and the other is an adult.
Literature Review:
            The other authors that have finds that are related to my work are Janice Radway. She wrote the book, Reading the Romance, and this work that she wrote does relate to my work. Her findings pointed out why women read romance novels. One reason she found that women read romance novels is because they wanted to get away from their daily lives, and make their own world of comfort and enjoyment. As illustrated in Radway’s conclusion, “In picking up a book, as they have so eloquently told us, they refuse temporarily their family’s otherwise constant demand that they attend to the wants of others even as they act deliberately to do something for their own private pleasure. Their activity is compensatory, solitary space within an arena where their self-interest is usually identified with the interest of others and where they are defined as a public resource to be mined at will by the family” (Radway 211). The second reason women read romance novels Radway discovered is: because they want the attention. Plus they want to feel the emotions that their everyday life does not have. “Romance reading supplements the avenues traditionally open to women for emotional gratification by supplying them vicariously with the attention and nurturance they do not get enough of in the round of day-to-day existence” (Radway 212). Lastly, the reason that women read romance novels is because they want to feel fulfilled and complete.
            What I am going to do differently from Radway is first I want to find out what plots women like in a romance novel. Another thing I am going to do differently from Radway is find out the features that women like in a romance novel. Radway also found those out in her surveys, but that was not the point of her book. Her point was why women read romances.
            Radway’s work relates to my work because during her surveys she found out what features a woman likes in a romance novel. That is my purpose to find out what features a woman likes in a romance novel. For example Radway asked in one of her surveys, “Can you briefly describe what makes romances more enjoyable than other kinds of books available today? ... What are the three most important ingredients in a romance? Please pick the three which you think are essential and rank them by placing a number 1 next to the most important ingredient, a number 2 next to the second most important, and so on” (Radway 230, 235). That is how Radway’s work relates to my work; she made questions to find the features of a romance novel in her research.
Methods:
            What I did with the two interviews was very different. Basically, during the first interview I did it face-to-face with my subject. The subject and I met at my house. I questioned my subject by using my computer. I had the questions right in front of me on my computer, and I used it to question the subject. The second subject, I was questioning over the telephone. I still had the questions in front of me on my computer, and I questioned the second subject. So in a way I did two different types of interviews: a face-to-face interview and a telephone interview.
            I chose my methods because they were the easiest to accomplish. It was easy for my first subject to come to my house because she lives near my house. As for the second subject, I was sick and it was also hard for the second subject to come and meet me face-to-face. So we had an interview over the telephone.
            How I prepared to collect my data is by using a recorder to record my interviews with the two subjects. I also collected my data by typing it on the computer after I listened to it on the recorder. The reason I prepared my data this way is because recording was the best way to keep the information. I could keep the information on tape and listen to it many times. Also I can make adjustments to my transcript at any time.
            How I collected my data is I recorded the interviews on the recorder. I recorded the interviews for thirty minutes each. I asked the questions each in a row and in order. But I did miss one question. It was the question on: How old were you when you started reading romance novels? Other than that, all the questions were answered, with great length and great honesty. Everything was collected smoothly, but the analysis had to be done a few times.
            How I analyzed the data is I just read, and reread the data. Then I saw which questions matched the others, and which data went together. I just read the data many times over, and I also see which data goes together to match my purpose.
Presentation of Data:
            My overall focus in my research is to find the features that woman like in a romance novel. The meaning of my classification system is on romance, and it is just based on romance novels and there features. My classification is in a few groups. Those groups are: The features of the books Rebecca and Twilight, What makes a good romance story, and what features are in the stories that make them a good romance novel to read.
            My categories occurred in different questions of my interview with my two subjects. The first category occurred in this question:
To you, what features make a good romance story?
·         Subject: Hmmmm. I think the main component for any good story is the characters. There has to be something about them that makes you want to know who they are.
·         Interviewer: Okay.
·         Subject: And the relationship between them doesn’t always have to be: they meet they fall in love, and then the love story is the best love story that you ever read.
·         Interviewer: Yeah.
·         Subject: But their love story has to compel you, you know. It has to be a good chemistry to write, and it also has to be the right scene, the right timing, the right plot. Casey Cat for example writes two series one young adult called The House of Night with her daughter Kristen Cat, and then one for herself called The Goddess Series which she modernizes the romances. What I love about it is that she brings the characters to life. She puts them in a new situation where you want to know what happens. I have seen her books, and I have stayed up until two or three in the morning reading these books. It’s just like with any TV show, you have to know what happens.
·         Interviewer: Know what happens. Yeah, and it’s the same thing with this thing that I am looking at. This show that I am looking at called Elementary I am still wondering about their relationship.
·         Subject: Yeah, exactly. You got it perfectly.  Yeah, because the best relationship of the majority of love is when one of them is oblivious.
·         Interviewer: I know right.
·         Subject: I think that is always the best one. Then you have one of them in love, well technically you have both of them in love, but one of them is too dumb to see it.
·         Interviewer: To see it, right?
·         Subject: Yeah, they feel sorry for her, or everybody feels pity for that one because of the kinds of horror this idiot is not putting one and one together.
·         Interviewer: Or if they would figure out one and one equal two.
·         Subject: Yeah, if they would only put it together. And eventually when you get to the end of the story the resolve is like finally you idiot, yea I am so happy for you, you finally realized it, but you a moron to wait that long.
·         Interviewer: Yeah, because they finally got together.
·         Subject: That’s the best relationship.
·         Interviewer: Yeah, they finally got together. But I have to add without all those guidance’s and explicitness wouldn’t you say that would lean towards more adult?
·         Subject: Yes, that would lean towards more adult. The House of Night novels are more teens; I think you can tell the differences between them because of the constant change in relationship. I think a more mature view on it is that there is one girl and one guy in the story. In the teen story there is one girl, and who knows how many guys.
·         Interviewer: Yeah, for teens they usually say they are trying to find their way, their like, they are just going through a battle with puberty.
·         Subject: Yes, but when you have a true romantic it has the candle light dinners, and the candelabras, and they are all in just the right setting. The guy that does not give into reality because most men are idiots.
·         Interviewer: Yes, I know.
·         Subject: I stand by my philosophy: When God made men, making dogs was redundant.
·         Interviewer: Redundant.
This question discusses the features of what makes a good romance novel. The first subject says that the characters, along with the chemistry in their relationship are what make a good romance novel. Then the next thing that makes a good romance novel is the progress in the character’s relationship. Even though they might or might not get together the reader still wants to see the progress in the character’s relationship. The next question still discusses the features of romance novels:
What do you like about modern day romances?
·         Subject: I think I like the drama qualities of it. You know you never know who is going to get screwed, who is going to get together with who, who is digressing, who going behind who’s back. You know it is always a constant puzzle of: “If she finds out about this she is going to beat the both of them to death.”, or “I can’t believe he did that to him.”, or “Oh, my god she is pregnant with his baby.”, or “Oh my gosh.”
·         Interviewer: True.
·         Subject: That is what you like about it. That…
·         Interviewer: That drama in it mostly.
·         Subject: Also that I guess it relates to today’s reality.
·         Interviewer: Yup, and that is true, and as you told me reality is a good motivator.
·         Subject: Reality is a good motivator. You know as long as it’s interesting and true, I guess you can see yourself in the situation (the character’s situation). Not that I didn’t like Twilight that you like so much. A lot of girls like to be looked as Bella. Who is getting her Edward? You can see yourself in that type of position.
·         Interviewer: Yeah.
·         Subject: That’s what I think it is. So I guess what’s good about modern day romances are that they can make everything into reality and a movie.
In this question it is discussed by the subject what is the best feature of modern day romances, which is the drama. Plus that everything is related to reality, and the women who read the modern day romances can relate to the story and the main character. Next is the question which discusses the features of classical romances:
What do you like about classical romances?
·         Subject: Hmmmm. Pride and Prejudice to me would have to be one of the best romances ever written.
·         Interviewer: I know right.
·         Subject: She made her world come to life. I mean even now after many years you can see yourself in that scenery. And what I like in a classical romance is: I guess the classical style. You know the characters, and their biography, the background and the colors, and the imagery. You don’t see that a lot in today’s romances. In today’s romances it’s about the drama. They are usually about the who stabbed who in the back. You don’t hear much about the background in the story, which I think is the most important part of any good story.
·         Interviewer: Wow, because that is just classical romances are mostly like about the time setting, and the girl….
·         Subject: I know that plays a part in it, but look at today’s romances. Let’s compare Twilight to Pride and Prejudice. Twilight, you really don’t get the feel of what Edward looks like, you know you really can’t tell me right now he looks like. She only gives you an idea.
·         Interviewer: Or Bella, she just looks like an average girl with brown hair and brown eyes.
·         Subject: Wow that was descriptive. In Pride and Prejudice you see this tall imposing figure who has this gruff voice and he is stout and the way he speaks, you can see that he is a very dignified lord very stiff and introvert and into himself. And you can sort of see the characters, and you can see the characters grow, and the passion and love in him grow. I mean the Victorian age is much romanticized. I mean it was the birthplace of classical romance that we know today. And it is the Victoria era you know, the guy is what every girl wants but no longer exists. You know he not the knight in shining armor, so last year, he’s not what everyone wants anymore. He is an English gent (gentleman), which is very much what classical romance is, but the reason why you want him more is because he is more classical (basically a true gentleman) than this modernize emo (emotional) gothic prince.
·         Interviewer: That’s true.
In this question that is discussed with the second subject, is on classical romance. Plus there are a few points in this discussion. The first point is what does a woman dream about when reading a classical romance? She dreams about the guy that she wants. She also reads this classical romance to get away from the reality that she is faced with. Second, another feature that makes these classical romance novels is the characters and their backgrounds. To relate to the characters the reader must know about them. The last point in this discussion is that the classical romance novel just takes you to a place that only exists in fantasies. These are the features in this discussion. Also all of the questions that were mentioned are on the features of romance novels.
Analysis of Data:
            The pattern of data I would have to say did have one pattern that I noticed in both interviews. Women basically not only today, but also thirty years ago want something that they have in common with. It is something that they could say, “Oh that happened to me once.” Then another pattern that came about conclusively was that women want something that they can dream about. It would be something that they could think of and always hold on to.
            These patterns just came up randomly in the interviews, and when I was analyzing the data. What the data means is that women want to have something in common with the romance novel that they read. Plus women like to dream when they read romance novels. Hey who does not like to dream when they read a story? How the data works is it reviews the information that I was given in the interviews, and it tells a story of what women want in a romance novel. So the data would be presented as an oral interview and descriptive data. 
Conclusion:
            My research question is what the features that women like in a romance are. What I found was that women love drama and they love something they can relate to in a romance. The romance story could be anything as long as it draws them into it. Plus as long as the women have something in common with the romance novel, they read it. I also found out that woman to do not just like the genres in a romance novel, they also like again how the story relates to them. In addition they do not want the story to be boring.
            My study is important because it confirms what different and all women like in a romance. The women tell which genres they like, but they all want the story to relate to them. Plus they want the story to be interesting. So my study confirms these theories by questioning different women of different ages.
            In my opinion, there is more left to do. The thing left to do is to figure out how to write the romance novel, once the information about what features women want in a romance are collected. Also how can the novel come together, and how can it meet a woman’s expectation?